PDX 2025 registration is live! Enter to win one of two free expo passes by filling out the survey.

Welcome to The Wave Engineering Newsletter, your weekly guide to the cutting edge of engineering. Whether you're a seasoned professional, an eager student, or simply curious about innovation, we’re here to inform, inspire, and connect.

More than just a newsletter, we tell the human stories behind the tech—spotlighting the innovators, dreamers, and changemakers shaping our world. Backed by insights from Pipeline Design & Engineering and the Being an Engineer Podcast, we deliver the latest advancements, impactful collaborations, and stories that redefine what’s possible.

Join the conversation at The Wave, where ideas spark, questions find answers, and the engineering community comes together to create the future. Engineering isn’t just about technology—it’s about people. Subscribe and ride the wave of innovation with us.

[Action Required]: Reply to this email answering the following question. Top, thought provoking comments will be featured on The Wave!

How do you build systems complex enough to push the boundaries of what's possible, while maintaining the human oversight needed to prevent catastrophic failure?

The same technological advances that make our systems more capable are making them less comprehensible to the humans who must ultimately be responsible for them.

We can now create digital twins that simulate entire manufacturing processes in real-time, predicting failures before they happen and optimizing production with superhuman precision. Yet Boeing's 737 MAX, packed with sophisticated automation meant to make flying safer, crashed twice because pilots couldn't understand what their own aircraft was thinking.

This is a fundamental challenge of modern engineering. We're building systems so complex that traditional specialization creates dangerous blind spots. The mechanical engineer designing the actuator doesn't fully grasp the software logic controlling it. The software engineer writing the control algorithms has never felt the physical forces their code will unleash. The systems engineer trying to integrate everything lacks the deep domain knowledge to spot the subtle interactions that lead to catastrophic failure.

The solution isn't to make our systems simpler - that ship has sailed. Instead, we're seeing the rise of a new breed of multi-interdisciplinary engineers who refuse to stay in their lanes. These professionals understand that the most critical engineering happens at the interfaces between disciplines, where mechanical meets electrical meets software meets human factors.

This newsletter examines three faces of this complexity paradox: how digital twins are simultaneously solving and creating new engineering challenges, why the future belongs to engineers who can think across traditional boundaries, and what the 737 MAX disaster reveals about the deadly cost of building systems we can't fully comprehend. Together, these stories show us both the promise and the peril of pushing engineering to its limits.

A former colleague's story highlighted a common manufacturing paradox: our most reliable equipment operates in digital darkness. While a decades-old CNC machine produced perfect parts, extracting operational data still required clipboards and manual readings.

Digital twins promise to solve this by creating real-time virtual replicas that capture operational data without modifying existing equipment. Unlike traditional monitoring, these systems establish bidirectional relationships where virtual testing directly optimizes physical performance.

BMW's implementation across 31 global plants demonstrates the potential: 30% reduction in production defects, 10% operational efficiency improvement, and management of 2,100 vehicle configurations with 99% customization. They support 15,000 employees with real-time data from millimeter-precision facility scans.

However, BMW's success reveals why adoption remains limited. Three critical barriers constrain scalability: architectural complexity that grows exponentially with each facility; expertise requirements for scarce industrial IoT and systems integration skills; and lengthy ROI timelines demanding sustained investment before measurable returns.

This creates a fundamental paradox - digital twins deliver essential competitive advantages yet remain beyond most manufacturers' reach due to implementation complexity. The result is a bifurcated market where sophisticated organizations achieve dramatic improvements while smaller companies face insurmountable barriers.

For engineers, digital twins represent high-demand career opportunities and an increasingly essential skillset for manufacturing advancement. The question isn't whether digital twins will transform manufacturing - they already are. It's whether benefits will remain concentrated among well-resourced organizations or eventually democratize through technological evolution.

Read my full analysis by clicking the button below.

At a recent tech meetup, one introduction stopped the room: "I'm Dave, a mechanical engineer with 40 years in aerospace who's now building hyper-realistic flight simulators."

Dave's transformation began in 2021 when a game studio hired him to improve flight mechanics in their aviation game. What started as consulting became an obsession - he realized game engines could create dynamic, data-rich environments that traditional CAD simply cannot match.

His current project proves the point: a B-17 bomber digital twin that integrates real-time environmental data, weather patterns, and mechanical wear characteristics. The result feels so authentic that experienced pilots describe it as "like flying the real thing."

This is the future of engineering. While CAD creates static documentation, game engines enable real-time physics simulation, IoT sensor integration, and collaborative virtual environments. The career opportunity is massive because virtually no engineers develop expertise in both domains.

Your engineering background isn't a limitation - it's your competitive advantage. Domain expertise transforms game engines from entertainment tools into engineering solutions. Companies desperately need digital transformation specialists who understand both worlds, and they're paying premium salaries for this rare combination.

The window won't stay open forever. Engineers who build multi-disciplinary expertise now will define the next generation of engineering tools. Read the full story below.

On March 10, 2019, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashed just six minutes after takeoff. Combined with Lion Air Flight 610 five months earlier, Boeing's 737 MAX had killed 346 people and triggered the largest aircraft grounding in aviation history.

The culprit wasn't just faulty software—it was a catastrophic communication breakdown that turned an engineering solution into a death trap.

Boeing developed MCAS (Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System) to make the 737 MAX handle like older models, avoiding costly pilot retraining. But as MCAS evolved from a minor system into powerful flight control automation, critical information never reached the teams that mattered. Software engineers didn't talk to training engineers. Flight test data showing aggressive system behavior never made it to manual writers. When engineers raised safety concerns, those warnings evaporated before reaching decision-makers.

The result? Pilots fighting an automated system they didn't know existed, couldn't understand, and weren't trained to override.

The lesson for engineering leaders: Complex systems demand transparent communication across all organizational boundaries. When you hide technical complexity instead of properly communicating it, you're not protecting users—you're putting them at risk.

In engineering, what you don't communicate can kill.

Read the full article by clicking the button below.

Engineering is about solving, innovating, and connecting ideas to make a difference. Progress is a collective effort and your curiosity is what drives it forward. Thank you for exploring the dynamic world of engineering with all of us at Pipeline Design & Engineering and The Wave.

If you found value in this newsletter, share it with a friend or colleague who might enjoy it too. Don’t forget to subscribe so you never miss a new perspective, idea, or breakthrough.

“Creativity is just connecting things. When you ask creative people how they did something, they feel a little guilty because they didn’t really do it, they just saw something. It seemed obvious to them after a while.” - Steve Jobs

In collaboration and creativity,
Brad Hirayama
Blueprinting tomorrow, today